Showing posts with label calories. Show all posts
Showing posts with label calories. Show all posts

Friday, 29 June 2007

Return: Biceps & Back

ExerciseWarmupSet 1Set 2Set 3
EZ Barbell Curl12×15kg12×20kg10×25kg8×27.5kg(-8.9%)
Cable Underhand Pulldown12×49kg12×56kg10×61kg8×63kg(+12.5%)
Dumbbell Hammer Curl12×7.5kg10×10kg8×12.5kg(+4.2%)
Dumbbell Lateral Raise12×7.5kg10×10kg8×12.5kg(+39%)
Sled Seated Calf Press12×79kg12×115kg10×124kg8×133kg(+7.3%)

Not too bad after a break. Slight improvements on everything except the barbell curl, which might be ascribed to my lack of cardio warm-up.

With my weight and BF, things look less positive. Andy's mentioned that scales that attempt to measure it via electrical impedance are notoriously inaccurate, and also that whether you measure before or after a workout can make a difference. With that in mind, I measured both:

MeasurementBefore WorkoutAfter Workout
Weight74.1kg74.4kg
FFM60.8kg60.3kg
BF18.0%18.9%
FFM Change+0.9kg+0.4kg
Fat Mass Change-0.1kg+0.7kg

Since I normally measure after a workout, and an increase of muscle mass with a decrease in body fat seems utterly implausible, let alone when I'm not working out, I'm going to assume the latter figures are more accurate. Which means that, roughly, I was over-consuming an average of about 300 calories a day during the trip.

Wednesday, 27 June 2007

On the North American diet

I returned back to England on Monday afternoon have been regretting it ever since. Canada, and the little I saw of upper state New York (Niagara Falls State Park) are utterly, breathtakingly, terrifyingly beautiful.

Now, as the cliché goes; everything's bigger in North America. I can confirm this is certainly true of their sea-like great lakes, massively ugly cars (one could easily get the - incorrect - impression that most people run haulage operations on the side; or the - correct - impression that they drive everywhere - even though everywhere in central Toronto is walkable), and most of all of their food.
You can buy a Double Big Mac for about $6. You can also buy some of the best raspberries you'll ever eat for $3 a punnet, or some of the best salmon for just over $10 a pound.
Living there would make eating healthily much easier and cheaper than here. However, eating unhealthily and excessively would be easier still.

I'm afraid I did a bit of both.

The weather in Toronto was also unexpectedly hot - it was 31 degrees when we arrived, with hardly a cloud in the sky. So, I took to drinking a local staple, Tim Hortons Ice Cappuccino.

Somewhat sneakily, Tim Hortons' own nutrition guide only gives you the calories for 10oz (medium) beverages. The only data I could find their exact beverage sizes was from a self-professed employee's blog comment. Cross referencing the two; if an ice cappuccino is 250 calories - made with cream, unless you specifically ask for it to be made with milk - and thus a large, 14oz ice cap is 350 calories.

That's more than my intended meal allowance in one shot.

In addition, I'd often order some solid food to go with my coffee, in the form of a cream cheese bagel - which their FAQ specifically recommends for a low fat diet. My first such order met with a bewildering paradox of choice - did I want plain; onion; flax, poppy or sesame seed; 12 grain; cinnamon raisin; blueberry; sun dried tomato; or the so-called everything bagel, presumably intended to allow indecisive virgins such as myself to opt out of a potentially line stalling decision. The cream cheese also came in four varieties; plain, light, herb and garlic and strawberry (!). Total calories for an everything with herb and garlic: 421 calories, for a total of 771 calories for what was intended to be a light snack.

In future, I'll think twice before criticising Americans for having an obesity problem.

Friday, 25 May 2007

Calculating optimal calorie intake

I was reading 'Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle' last night, and it's made me realise that, like I'd imagine a lot of people, I have no idea how many calories I consume, much less how many I should be consuming.
The average TDEE for men is 2800; but I'm short, and have a desk job, so probably burn a lot less. It's time for some calculations.

On Wednesday I took a new set of measurements; I've gone up to 72kg, but down to 18.8% body fat - which means I've lost 0.3kg fat and gained 0.6kg lean body mass since last Monday. Which is, if not a blip, a sign of excellent progress

Using the Harris-Benedict formula (for men) gives me a BMR of:

66.5 + (13.75 × [weight in kg]) + (5.003 × [height in cm]) - (6.775 × [age])
= 66.5 + 13.75 × 72.0 + 5.003 × 173 - 6.775 × 29
= 1725.544

Using the Katch-McArdle formula gives me a BMR of:

370 + (21.6 × [lean mass in kg])
= 370 + 21.6 × 58.5
= 1633.6

That's quite a difference already.
Converting that into a TDEE using EXRX's calculator (estimated 9 hours rest, 13 hours very light activity, 2 hours light activity - commuting and cleaning my flat) gives 2409 and 2279 calories. Using the flat 1.2 multiplier for a desk job from ''Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle' gives 2071 and 1960 calories.

This gives a total range of 1960 - 2409 calories, i.e. 469 calories. I'm thus going to calculate my ideal calorie intake for weight loss it cautiously, and aim for the lower recommended percentage drop (15%) against an average of the above figures (2180 calories), i.e. 1853 calories.
Should my actual TDEE turn out to be close to the lower end of that scale, it represents a 5.6% / 109 calorie drop; if the higher end of the scale, a 23.1% / 556 calorie drop. So even if the initial estimate is wrong, it shouldn't be damagingly so.

I'm going to start with five meals a day, and decide whether to move to six once I'm into a routine. This means each meal should be approximately 370.6 calories, 436 on 'cheat' days (every fourth day, to reset my metabolism). Ideally, breakfast should be 100 calories more, and dinner 100 less, but again, that can wait.